Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lloyd v. SC Dept Corr, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Grady Edward Lloyd in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its September 12, 2000 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-02-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7429

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Grady Edward Lloyd in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its September 12, 2000 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Lloyd v. SC Dept Corr, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Grady Edward Lloyd in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its September 12, 2000 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7429

    GRADY EDWARD LLOYD,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
    PHOEBE B. JOHNSON; MRS. CROCK; GAIL FRICKS;
    PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (CA-99-2206-4-18BF)

    Submitted:

    February 8, 2001

    Decided:

    February 14, 2001

    Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Grady Edward Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.
    Steven Michael Pruitt,
    Robert W. Cone, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON,
    Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Grady Edward Lloyd appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Lloyd v. South Carolina Dept of Corr., No. CA-99-2206-4-18BF
    (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like