Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Deal v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Jerry Deal appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that Deal was not entitled to habeas corpus relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-01-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6653

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jerry Deal appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that Deal was not entitled to habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Deal v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jerry Deal appealed the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that Deal was not entitled to habeas corpus relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6653

    JERRY NATHAN DEAL,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL MOORE, SCDC Commissioner; CHARLES M.
    CONDON, Attorney General,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. William B. Traxler, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-97-1676-0-21)

    Submitted:

    December 8, 1998

    Decided:

    January 13, 1999

    Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Jerry Nathan Deal, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
    Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jerry Deal appeals the district courts order denying relief
    on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
    1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find


    no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court.

    Deal v. Moore, No. CA-97-1676-0-21 (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 1998).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like