Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McNeill v. Vanburen, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views3 pages
    James McNeill filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-12-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7253

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    James McNeill filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views3 pages

    McNeill v. Vanburen, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James McNeill filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments because the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7253

    JAMES C. MCNEILL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SHARON SNYDER, LPN; ELEXIA CRAIG, LPN,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    DENNIS
    VANBUREN,
    2nd
    Shift
    Lieutenant;
    BENJAMIN LEA, 2nd Shift Sergeant; MARY WATSON,
    RN; MS. ROYSTER, 2nd Shift C/O; HOWARD
    CRABTREE, 2nd Shift C/O; ASHANTI WILLIAMS, 2nd
    Shift C/O; JAMES WILLIAMS, 2nd Shift C/O;
    NORWOOD, 2nd Shift C/O; LINDA MORGAN, 3rd
    Shift C/O,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (CA-03-120-5-BO)

    Submitted:

    December 16, 2004

    Decided:

    Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    December 22, 2004

    James C. McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.


    Deborrah Lynn Newton,
    Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    James C. McNeill appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    district

    court.

    See

    McNeill v. Vanburen, No. CA-03-120-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 13, 2004).


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like