Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Atchley v. Winston-Salem, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Stephanie Atchley v. City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina and Police Officer J.E. Bowman. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Atchley's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision after reviewing the record. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-11-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6794

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Stephanie Atchley v. City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina and Police Officer J.E. Bowman. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Atchley's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision after reviewing the record. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Atchley v. Winston-Salem, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Stephanie Atchley v. City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina and Police Officer J.E. Bowman. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Atchley's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision after reviewing the record. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6794

    STEPHANIE ATCHLEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA; J. E.
    BOWMAN, Police Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem.
    Richard C. Erwin,
    Senior District Judge. (CA-96-526-6)
    Submitted:

    October 7, 1997

    Decided:

    November 7, 1997

    Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Stephanie Atchley, Appellant Pro Se. Gusti Wiesenfeld Frankel,
    WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina,
    for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    her 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Atchley v. Winston-Salem, No. CA-96-526-6 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 1997).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like