Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Patrick Christian v. James Townsend, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Patrick O. Christian's appeal of the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint for the reasons stated in Christian v. Townsend, et al. (No. 3:12-cv-00021-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2012)). The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-03-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-1100

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Patrick O. Christian's appeal of the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint for the reasons stated in Christian v. Townsend, et al. (No. 3:12-cv-00021-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2012)). The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Patrick Christian v. James Townsend, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Patrick O. Christian's appeal of the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous. The district court had dismissed the complaint for the reasons stated in Christian v. Townsend, et al. (No. 3:12-cv-00021-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2012)). The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-1100

    PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    JAMES TOWNSEND, Property Manager, Monroe Hall; RODNEY
    MOORE, Chief of Police, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police
    Department; DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR., Sheriff, Mecklenburg
    County Sheriff Department; TOM CALLAHAN, US Postmaster,
    Charlotte Mecklenburg US Post Office; CARSON DEAN, CEO,
    Charlotte Mecklenburg Mens Homeless Shelter; FNU BURKE,
    General Surgeon, W.G. Hefner VA Medical Center; LYNN R.
    HOLMES, Chief Executive Officer, NC Employment Security
    Commission,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
    District Judge. (3:12-cv-00021-MOC-DCK)

    Submitted:

    March 15, 2012

    Decided:

    March 20, 2012

    Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Patrick O. Christian, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:

    order

    Patrick

    O.

    Christian

    dismissing

    his

    civil

    1915(e) (2006).

    appeals

    rights

    the

    complaint

    district
    under

    We

    dispense

    3:12-cv-00021-MOC-DCK

    with

    U.S.C.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

    for the reasons stated by the district court.


    No.

    28

    We have reviewed the record and find that

    this appeal is frivolous.

    Townsend,

    courts

    oral

    argument

    (W.D.N.C.

    because

    the

    Christian v.

    Jan.
    facts

    19,
    and

    2012).
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like