Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Shores v. Boone, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Fred Shores, Jr. v. Marion Boone and Connie Watson. The district court denied relief on Shores' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-05-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7793

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Fred Shores, Jr. v. Marion Boone and Connie Watson. The district court denied relief on Shores' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views2 pages

    Shores v. Boone, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Fred Shores, Jr. v. Marion Boone and Connie Watson. The district court denied relief on Shores' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7793

    FRED SHORES, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MARION BOONE, Attorney; CONNIE WATSON,
    Sheriff,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
    District Judge. (CA-00-79-1)

    Submitted:

    April 27, 2001

    Decided:

    May 3, 2001

    Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Fred Shores, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Perry Cleveland Henson, Jr.,
    HENSON & HENSON, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina; Fred Folger,
    Jr., Mt. Airy, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Fred Shores, Jr. appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Shores v. Boone, No. CA-00-79-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2000).

    We dis-

    pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like