Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    1) Robert Smith appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 28 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore affirmed the district court's denial of Smith's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling and denied Smith's other motions in this appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-06-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7648

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Robert Smith appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 28 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore affirmed the district court's denial of Smith's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling and denied Smith's other motions in this appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Robert Smith appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 28 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. 3) The Fourth Circuit therefore affirmed the district court's denial of Smith's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling and denied Smith's other motions in this appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7648

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    ROBERT SMITH, a/k/a Boo Boo,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
    (1:03-cr-00369-CCB-4)

    Submitted:

    April 27, 2009

    Decided:

    June 4, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Paul M. Tiao, Assistant United


    States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert
    denying

    his

    28

    Smith
    U.S.C.

    appeals

    the

    district

    3582(c)(2)

    (2006)

    courts

    motion.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    order

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we deny Smiths motion to compel the district court to produce


    his

    plea

    agreement

    and

    transcript

    of

    his

    arraignment,

    deny

    Smiths motion to place his case in abeyance, and affirm for the
    reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v. Smith,

    No. 1:03-cr-00369-CCB-4 (D. Md. May 2, 2008).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like