Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Carter v. Sawyer, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 2003 in which David Carter appealed the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus action and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's rulings, finding that Carter failed to state a valid claim for relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-10-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6286

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 2003 in which David Carter appealed the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus action and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's rulings, finding that Carter failed to state a valid claim for relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Carter v. Sawyer, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 2003 in which David Carter appealed the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus action and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's rulings, finding that Carter failed to state a valid claim for relief. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6286

    DAVID L. CARTER,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    KATHLEEN SAWYER,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-02-635-5-HC-H)

    Submitted:

    October 9, 2003

    Decided:

    October 17, 2003

    Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David L. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    David Carter appeals the district court orders and judgment
    summarily dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000) action and denying
    his motion for reconsideration.

    After reviewing the record, we

    find Carter failed to state a claim for relief.

    Accordingly, we

    affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like