Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Melvin Douglas Brown, 443 F.2d 1174, 4th Cir. (1971)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding the conviction of Melvin Douglas Brown for bank robbery. The court considered the briefs and arguments and found no errors in Brown's conviction under 18 U.S.C.A. 2113. While concurrent sentences were imposed for the three counts of the indictment, the court remanded the case back to the lower court to impose a single sentence instead of concurrent sentences. The conviction was affirmed but remanded for resentencing to a single sentence.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1971-06-30 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 443 F.2d 1174 Docket: 14369_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding the conviction of Melvin Douglas Brown for bank robbery. The court considered the briefs and arguments and found no errors in Brown's conviction under 18 U.S.C.A. 2113. While concurrent sentences were imposed for the three counts of the indictment, the court remanded the case back to the lower court to impose a single sentence instead of concurrent sentences. The conviction was affirmed but remanded for resentencing to a single sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views1 page

    United States v. Melvin Douglas Brown, 443 F.2d 1174, 4th Cir. (1971)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding the conviction of Melvin Douglas Brown for bank robbery. The court considered the briefs and arguments and found no errors in Brown's conviction under 18 U.S.C.A. 2113. While concurrent sentences were imposed for the three counts of the indictment, the court remanded the case back to the lower court to impose a single sentence instead of concurrent sentences. The conviction was affirmed but remanded for resentencing to a single sentence.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    443 F.

    2d 1174

    UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,


    v.
    Melvin Douglas BROWN, Appellant.
    No. 14369.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Argued June 9, 1971.
    Decided June 30, 1971.

    Geza Molnar (Court-appointed counsel), Silver Spring, Md., for appellant.


    Jean G. Rogers, Asst. U.S. Atty., (George Beall, U.S. Atty., on brief) for
    appellee.
    Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and RUSSELL,
    Circuit judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    After full consideration of the briefs and the argument of counsel, we find no
    error in the proceedings resulting in the appellant's conviction for bank robbery
    (18 U.S.C.A. 2113).

    Since concurrent sentences were imposed on the three counts of the indictment,
    we remand the case for imposition of a single sentence. United States v.
    Retolaza, 4 Cir., 398 F.2d 235; United States v. Spears, 4 Cir., 442 F.2d 424.

    Affirmed and remanded.

    You might also like