Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 99-6702
MUREL HOLLAND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL S. BRUCE, Officer, CO II; MARSHA
GRIFFIN, Officer, CO II; TODD ALEXANDER,
Officer, CO II,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; EUGENE M. NUTH,
Warden; CAPTAIN LOCKLEAR, CO V; LIEUTENANT
AULU, CO V; STUART H. SHAPIRO, M.D.; JEAN
SNYDER; PATRICIA WRIGHT, Doctor, M.D.; MARCIA
L. UPDIKE, Physician Assistant; MARVIN BRUCE,
Physician Assistant,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-96-1745-WMN)
Submitted:
Decided:
Murel Holland, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney
General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General,
Glen T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Murel Holland appeals the district court's order granting
judgment as a matter of law to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983
(West Supp. 1999) action on the basis that the pain and/or injury
Holland suffered was de minimis and therefore insufficient to
sustain a viable claim.
We review a district court's grant of judgment as a matter of
law de novo.
On review, the
facts are viewed and inferences are drawn in a light most favorable
to the nonmoving party.
(4th Cir. 1995).
Accordingly, we