Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Scott v. Maynard, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Mike S. Scott in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. They affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Scott v. Maynard, No. 8:07-cv-03080-AW (D. Md. Dec. 9, 2009). The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-10-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6023

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Mike S. Scott in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. They affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Scott v. Maynard, No. 8:07-cv-03080-AW (D. Md. Dec. 9, 2009). The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Scott v. Maynard, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Mike S. Scott in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. They affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Scott v. Maynard, No. 8:07-cv-03080-AW (D. Md. Dec. 9, 2009). The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6023

    MIKE S. SCOTT,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    GARY D. MAYNARD; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER; MR. MILLER; MR. DURST;
    MR. ROWLEY; MR. SHEARING; MR. GRAHAM; H. THOMAS; DR.
    HOLWAGER,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Alexander Williams, Jr., District
    Judge. (8:07-cv-03080-AW)

    Submitted:

    October 20, 2009

    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge,


    HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Decided:

    NIEMEYER,

    October 23, 2009

    Circuit

    Judge,

    and

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mike S. Scott, Appellant Pro Se.


    Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
    Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mike

    S.

    Scott

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Scott v. Maynard, No. 8:07-cv-03080-AW (D. Md. Dec. 9,

    2009).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like