Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sanders v. Carol M. Browner, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a case brought by Launeil Sanders and the Launeil Freedom Constitutional Environmental Foundation against the EPA Administrator and Engelhard Corporation. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the case. The appeals court also denied Sanders's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-06-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-2629

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a case brought by Launeil Sanders and the Launeil Freedom Constitutional Environmental Foundation against the EPA Administrator and Engelhard Corporation. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the case. The appeals court also denied Sanders's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Sanders v. Carol M. Browner, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a case brought by Launeil Sanders and the Launeil Freedom Constitutional Environmental Foundation against the EPA Administrator and Engelhard Corporation. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the case. The appeals court also denied Sanders's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-2629

    LAUNEIL SANDERS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    LAUNEIL FREEDOM CONSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL
    FOUNDATION,
    Plaintiff,
    versus
    CAROL M. BROWNER, United States Environmental
    Protection Agency Administrator; ENGELHARD
    CORPORATION,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-97-998-6-20AK)
    Submitted:

    May 28, 1998

    Decided:

    Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    June 9, 1998

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Launeil Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Weinberg Jacobs, William
    Thomas Lavender, Jr., NEXSEN, PRUET, JACOBS & POLLARD, Columbia,
    South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Launeil Sanders appeals the district court's order dismissing
    the action below. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
    judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Sanders v. Browner, No. CA-97-9986-20AK (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 1997). We deny Sanders's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like