Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1995. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Douglas Lee Husketh on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without finding any reversible error. The Fourth Circuit finds the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the lower court materials and that oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-10-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 67 F.3d 295 Docket: 95-6923

    Original Title

    Douglas Lee Husketh v. Loomis Woodard, Superintendent Lieutenant Mitchell, Employee at Johnston County Correctional Center Sergeant Pittman, Employee at Johnston County Correctional Center Mr. Hind, Physician's Assistant at Johnston County Correctional Center John Doe and John Doe, in Their Individual and Official Capacities State of North Carolina, 67 F.3d 295, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1995. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Douglas Lee Husketh on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without finding any reversible error. The Fourth Circuit finds the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the lower court materials and that oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1995. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Douglas Lee Husketh on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without finding any reversible error. The Fourth Circuit finds the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the lower court materials and that oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    67 F.

    3d 295

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Douglas Lee HUSKETH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Loomis WOODARD, Superintendent; Lieutenant Mitchell,
    Employee at Johnston County Correctional Center; Sergeant
    Pittman, Employee at Johnston County Correctional Center;
    Mr. Hind, Physician's Assistant at Johnston County
    Correctional Center; John Doe and John Doe, in their
    individual and official capacities; State of North
    Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-6923.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Sept. 21, 1995.
    Decided Oct. 4, 1995.

    Douglas Lee Husketh, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Husketh v. Woodard, No. CA-94-545-5-BR
    (E.D.N.C. June 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like