Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dennis v. Vaughn, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Ronald A. Dennis against several prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court had dismissed Dennis's complaint, and the appellate court affirmed the dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-01-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7666

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Ronald A. Dennis against several prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court had dismissed Dennis's complaint, and the appellate court affirmed the dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Dennis v. Vaughn, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Ronald A. Dennis against several prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court had dismissed Dennis's complaint, and the appellate court affirmed the dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7666

    RONALD A. DENNIS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    D.M. VAUGHN, Warden; L. THOMPSON, Institutional Physician;
    LIEUTENANT
    STOKES,
    Supervisor;
    SERGEANT
    PHARREL,
    Transportation
    Officer;
    OFFICER
    GRIER,
    Transportation
    Officer; OFFICER THORTON, Transportation Officer; STEPHEN
    HAVARD, Chief Physician; FRED SCHILLING, Health Services
    Director,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Liam OGrady, District
    Judge. (1:08-cv-00712-LO-TRJ)

    Submitted:

    January 13, 2009

    Before WILLIAMS,
    Judges.

    Chief

    Judge,

    Decided:

    and

    TRAXLER

    January 16, 2009

    and

    KING,

    Circuit

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronald A. Dennis, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronald A. Dennis appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915A(b) (2006).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    TRJ

    (E.D.

    dispense

    Dennis v. Vaughn, No. 1:08-cv-00712-LO-

    Va.

    filed

    July

    28

    with

    oral

    argument

    &

    entered

    because

    July
    the

    30,
    facts

    2008).
    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like