Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jones, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Willshawn Jones' motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) to reduce his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found that Jones was ineligible for a sentence reduction under § 3582(c) because his sentence was imposed under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1, which does not authorize a reduction. Therefore, the district court properly denied Jones' motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-01-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7149

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Willshawn Jones' motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) to reduce his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found that Jones was ineligible for a sentence reduction under § 3582(c) because his sentence was imposed under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1, which does not authorize a reduction. Therefore, the district court properly denied Jones' motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    United States v. Jones, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Willshawn Jones' motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) to reduce his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found that Jones was ineligible for a sentence reduction under § 3582(c) because his sentence was imposed under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1, which does not authorize a reduction. Therefore, the district court properly denied Jones' motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7149

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    WILLSHAWN JONES,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
    Judge. (7:02-cr-00244-HMH-13)

    Submitted:

    October 27, 2008

    Decided:

    January 28, 2009

    Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Willshawn Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Willshawn

    Jones

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).


    reviewed

    the

    record

    properly

    denied

    and

    because

    find

    that

    Jones

    is

    the

    3582(c)

    ineligible

    n.10(D)(ii)(II)

    (2008).

    Accordingly,

    we

    find

    error and affirm the district courts order.


    No.

    dispense

    We have

    motion
    a

    was

    sentence

    See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual 2D1.1 cmt.

    reduction.

    Jones,

    for

    order

    7:02-cr-00244-HMH-13

    with

    oral

    argument

    (D.S.C.
    because

    June
    the

    no

    reversible

    United States v.
    6,

    2008).

    facts

    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like