Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from May 30, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Charles Jones on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The case involved claims against Maryland corrections officials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-05-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 86 F.3d 1150 Docket: 95-7946

    Original Title

    Charles Jones, A/K/A Nicholas Warner Jones v. Bishop L. Robinson Richard A. Lanham, Sr. Melanie C. Pereira William L. Smith Sewall B. Smith Patricia Briggs Margaret Chippendale E. Jefferson Bradley Butler Purnell Leake Officer Hilton Terry Jackson W. Clark A. Coward P. Richardson Captain Matthews Officer Campher Calvin Vinson, and Jarmal Johnson, Inmate, 86 F.3d 1150, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from May 30, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Charles Jones on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The case involved claims against Maryland corrections officials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from May 30, 1996. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Charles Jones on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The case involved claims against Maryland corrections officials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    86 F.

    3d 1150

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Charles JONES, a/k/a Nicholas Warner Jones, PlaintiffAppellant,
    v.
    Bishop L. ROBINSON; Richard A. Lanham, Sr.; Melanie C.
    Pereira; William L. Smith; Sewall B. Smith; Patricia
    Briggs; Margaret Chippendale; E. Jefferson; Bradley
    Butler; Purnell Leake; Officer Hilton; Terry Jackson; W.
    Clark; A. Coward; P. Richardson; Captain Matthews;
    Officer Campher; Calvin Vinson, Defendants-Appellees,
    and
    Jarmal Johnson, Inmate, Defendant.
    No. 95-7946.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 16, 1996.
    Decided: May 30, 1996.

    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-94-2375-L)
    Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney
    General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v.
    Robinson, No. CA-94-2375-L (D.Md. Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like