Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Claybrooks v. Newsome, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Sally E. Claybrooks under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three defendants. The district court denied Claybrooks relief and she appealed. The Court of Appeals affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court also cites a recent Supreme Court decision in support of its ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-09-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7097

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Sally E. Claybrooks under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three defendants. The district court denied Claybrooks relief and she appealed. The Court of Appeals affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court also cites a recent Supreme Court decision in support of its ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Claybrooks v. Newsome, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Sally E. Claybrooks under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three defendants. The district court denied Claybrooks relief and she appealed. The Court of Appeals affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court also cites a recent Supreme Court decision in support of its ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7097

    SALLY E. CLAYBROOKS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JIM NEWSOME, Safety Inspector; MARY CLARKE,
    Doctor VCCW; BOBBI HENDERSON, Nurse,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (CA-00-1097-AM)

    Submitted:

    September 10, 2001

    Decided:

    September 18, 2001

    Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Sally E. Claybrooks, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Sally E. Claybrooks appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

    the district court. Claybrooks v. Newsome, No. CA-00-1097-AM (E.D.


    Va. July 21, 2000); see Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 (2001).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like