Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • James Primus v. Bryan Stirling, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    1) James Anthony Primus filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina Department of Corrections officials which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). 2) Primus appealed the district court's dismissal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the record. The court also denied Primus' motion for appointment of counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-09-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7163

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) James Anthony Primus filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina Department of Corrections officials which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). 2) Primus appealed the district court's dismissal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the record. The court also denied Primus' motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    James Primus v. Bryan Stirling, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) James Anthony Primus filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against South Carolina Department of Corrections officials which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). 2) Primus appealed the district court's dismissal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the record. The court also denied Primus' motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7163

    JAMES ANTHONY PRIMUS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    BRYAN STIRLING, SCDC Director; TIFFANY N. RICHARDSON, ODC,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    MR. WILLIAM BYARS,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (4:13-cv-00768-JFA)

    Submitted:

    September 23, 2014

    Before NIEMEYER and


    Senior Circuit Judge.

    GREGORY,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    September 26, 2014

    Judges,

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Anthony Primus, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    James

    Anthony

    Primus

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    dismissing

    without

    prejudice

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) (2012).


    the record and find no reversible error.

    1983

    (2012)

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we deny

    Primus motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the


    reasons stated by the district court.

    Primus v. Stirling, No.

    4:13-cv-00768-JFA (D.S.C. July 29, 2014).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like