Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration in a civil rights case brought by Samuel Previtire against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-12-12 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 72 F.3d 127 Docket: 95-7467

    Original Title

    Samuel Previtire v. Timothy Reeves, Sergeant D.N. Dillow, Correctional Officer Russell Journell, Correctional Officer W.D. Blankenship, Former Warden, Bland Correctional Center K.M. Payne, Sergeant Sergeant Carroll D.L. Smith, Assistant Warden P.L. Huffman, Warden Frances L. Ashley v. Wolfe Ted A. Durr G. Hughes R. Hall R.A. Young Magistrate Hall E.W. Murray, 72 F.3d 127, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration in a civil rights case brought by Samuel Previtire against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration in a civil rights case brought by Samuel Previtire against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's ruling without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    72 F.

    3d 127
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Samuel PREVITIRE, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    Timothy REEVES, Sergeant; D.N. Dillow, Correctional
    Officer; Russell Journell, Correctional Officer; W.D.
    Blankenship, Former Warden, Bland Correctional Center;
    K.M.
    Payne, Sergeant; Sergeant Carroll; D.L. Smith, Assistant
    Warden; P.L. Huffman, Warden; Frances L. Ashley; V.
    Wolfe; Ted A. Durr; G. Hughes; R. Hall; R.A. Young;
    Magistrate Hall; E.W. Murray, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-7467.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
    Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-93-983-R).
    Samuel Previtire, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,
    Assistant Attorney General, Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    W.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for
    reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
    and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Previtire v. Reeves, No. CA-93-983-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 12, 1995).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like