Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Shingler, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Michael Shingler appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied Shingler's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-06-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6420

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Shingler appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied Shingler's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Shingler, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Shingler appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied Shingler's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6420

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MICHAEL A. SHINGLER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-97-318)
    Submitted:

    May 14, 1998

    Decided:

    June 3, 1998

    Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Michael A. Shingler, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Shingler seeks to appeal the district court's order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
    of the district court. United States v. Shingler, No. CR-97-318
    (E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like