Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to William Ernest Howard under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit found Howard's appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-09-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 974 F.2d 1331 Docket: 92-6566

    Original Title

    William Ernest Howard v. Dr. Henry Ozinal, S.C.C. Doctor Sandra M. Early, Reg. Nurse John Doe, S.C.C. Medical Staff Jane Doe, S.C.C. Medical Staff, and John B. Taylor, Warden, 974 F.2d 1331, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to William Ernest Howard under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit found Howard's appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to William Ernest Howard under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit found Howard's appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    974 F.

    2d 1331

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    William Ernest HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Dr. Henry OZINAL, S.C.C. Doctor; Sandra M. Early, Reg.
    Nurse; John Doe, S.C.C. Medical Staff; Jane Doe,
    S.C.C. Medical Staff, Defendants-Appellees,
    and
    John B. TAYLOR, Warden, Defendant.
    No. 92-6566.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 13, 1992
    Decided: September 4, 1992

    William Ernest Howard, Appellant Pro Se.


    Colin James Steuart Thomas, III, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS &
    MOSES, P.C., Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION
    1

    William Ernest Howard appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Howard v. Ozinal, No. CA-91-282-R (W.D.

    Va. Oct. 21, 1991 & May 19, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like