Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1987. It involves Gerald S. Kemp appealing the district court's denial of relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) from a previous judgment against him. The Fourth Circuit agrees with the district court's finding that the arguments in Kemp's Rule 60(b) motion did not warrant overturning the previous judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's denial of the motion and dispenses with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-04-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 818 F.2d 29 Docket: 85-6286

    Original Title

    Gerald S. Kemp v. Steven Bernstein, Deputy Paul Birch, Deputy Darryl Lewis, Deputy Sheriff C. Joseph, Deputy Sheriff James James, Deputy and Liam O'grady, Attorney, in Their Official and Individual Capacities, 818 F.2d 29, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1987. It involves Gerald S. Kemp appealing the district court's denial of relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) from a previous judgment against him. The Fourth Circuit agrees with the district court's finding that the arguments in Kemp's Rule 60(b) motion did not warrant overturning the previous judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's denial of the motion and dispenses with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1987. It involves Gerald S. Kemp appealing the district court's denial of relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) from a previous judgment against him. The Fourth Circuit agrees with the district court's finding that the arguments in Kemp's Rule 60(b) motion did not warrant overturning the previous judgment. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's denial of the motion and dispenses with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    818 F.

    2d 29
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Gerald S. KEMP, Appellant,
    v.
    Steven BERNSTEIN, Deputy; Paul Birch, Deputy; Darryl
    Lewis, Deputy Sheriff; C. Joseph, Deputy Sheriff; James
    James, Deputy; and Liam O'Grady, Attorney, In their
    official and individual capacities, Appellees.
    No. 85-6286.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 24, 1987.
    Decided April 27, 1987.

    Before RUSSELL, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


    Gerald S. Kemp, appellant pro se.
    Gerald L. Baliles, Attorney General; Claude M. Hilton; Leo R. Andrews,
    Jr., for appellees.
    PER CURIAM:

    Gerald S. Kemp appeals from the district court's denial of relief under Fed. R.
    Civ. P . 60 (b) . The district court found that the arguments raised in Kemp's
    Rule 60(b) motion did not warrant disturbing the judgment entered against him.
    We agree and accordingly find neither error nor abuse of discretion in the
    district court's denial of the motion. We dispense with oral argument because
    the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively and affirm the
    judgment of the district court.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like