Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Theodore Kenneth Gale v. Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden, 25 F.3d 1039, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Theodore Kenneth Gale in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case Gale v. Rickards, No. CA-93-1436-AM. The Fourth Circuit dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials available to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-05-18 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 25 F.3d 1039 Docket: 94-6001

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Theodore Kenneth Gale in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case Gale v. Rickards, No. CA-93-1436-AM. The Fourth Circuit dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials available to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Theodore Kenneth Gale v. Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden, 25 F.3d 1039, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Theodore Kenneth Gale in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case Gale v. Rickards, No. CA-93-1436-AM. The Fourth Circuit dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials available to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    25 F.

    3d 1039
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Theodore Kenneth GALE, Petitioner Appellant,


    v.
    Carolyn v. RICKARDS, Warden, Respondent Appellee.
    No. 94-6001.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: April 21, 1994.
    Decided: May 18, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-931436-AM)
    Theodore Kenneth Gale, Appellant Pro Se.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
    Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Gale v. Rickards, No. CA-93-1436-AM
    (E.D. Va. Nov. 19, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like