Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bowling v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    William Roger Bowling filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the sheriff and chief jailer alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Bowling appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6308

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    William Roger Bowling filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the sheriff and chief jailer alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Bowling appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Bowling v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    William Roger Bowling filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the sheriff and chief jailer alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Bowling appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6308

    WILLIAM ROGER BOWLING,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOE JOHNSON, Sheriff; LINDA MCGUIRE, Chief
    Jailer,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.
    (CA-95-237)
    Submitted:

    July 25, 1996

    Decided:

    August 7, 1996

    Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    William Roger Bowling, Appellant Pro Se. James Rutledge Henderson,
    IV, HENDERSON & DE COURCY, P.C., Tazewell, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Bowling v. Johnson, No. CA-95-237 (W.D. Va. Feb. 20, 1996).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like