Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Garland Ellison, 4th Cir. (2014)
United States v. Garland Ellison, 4th Cir. (2014)
No. 14-6817
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (4:08-cr-00062-F-1; 4:12-cv-00002-F)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Garland Ellison seeks to appeal the district courts
order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2255 (2012) motion.
The
certificate
(2012).
of
appealability.
28
U.S.C.
2253(c)(1)(B)
on
the
demonstrating
district
merits,
that
courts
debatable
or
prisoner
reasonable
assessment
wrong.
Slack
satisfies
jurists
this
would
of
the
v.
McDaniel,
standard
find
constitutional
529
U.S.
by
that
the
claims
is
473,
484
is
debatable,
and
that
the
motion
states
debatable
at 484-85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
that Ellison has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly,
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions
are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED