Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wooten v. Lightburn, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Olin Wooten and Robert C. Lightburn. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of Wooten on his claims of specific performance and unjust enrichment against Lightburn. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and additional arguments would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-11-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-2279

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Olin Wooten and Robert C. Lightburn. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of Wooten on his claims of specific performance and unjust enrichment against Lightburn. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and additional arguments would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Wooten v. Lightburn, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Olin Wooten and Robert C. Lightburn. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling in favor of Wooten on his claims of specific performance and unjust enrichment against Lightburn. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It dispensed with oral arguments because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented to the court and additional arguments would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-2279

    OLIN WOOTEN,
    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    ROBERT C. LIGHTBURN,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
    Glen M. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (1:07-cv-00052-gmw-pms)

    Submitted:

    October 28, 2009

    Decided:

    November 12, 2009

    Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    C. Connor Crook, BOYLE, BAIN, REBACK & SLAYTON, Charlottesville,


    Virginia, for Appellant.
    Daniel R. Bieger, COPELAND & BIEGER,
    P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert C. Lightburn appeals the district courts order
    entering judgment in Olin Wootens favor on Wootens specific
    performance and unjust enrichment claims against Lightburn.
    have

    reviewed

    Accordingly,
    Wooten

    v.

    the

    we

    affirm

    Lightburn,

    Sept. 30, 2008).


    facts

    and

    materials

    record

    legal
    before

    the
    No.

    and

    find

    district

    no

    reversible

    courts

    error.

    judgment.

    1:07-cv-00052-gmw-pms

    We

    See

    (W.D.

    Va.

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like