Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Lynval Anderson, JR., 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Lynval Kerris Anderson, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of Anderson's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit also denied oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-06-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6422

    Original Title

    United States v. Lynval Anderson, Jr., 4th Cir. (2012)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lynval Kerris Anderson, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of Anderson's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit also denied oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Lynval Anderson, JR., 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lynval Kerris Anderson, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of Anderson's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit also denied oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6422

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    LYNVAL KERRIS ANDERSON, JR., a/k/a Peter, a/k/a Lynval Kerris,
    a/k/a Amxmill Kerris, a/k/a Michael Reid, a/k/a Jamaican Pete,
    a/k/a Joseph Anderson,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
    Senior District Judge. (2:98-cr-00143-HCM-1)

    Submitted:

    June 21, 2012

    Decided:

    June 26, 2012

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lynval Kerris Anderson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Tayman,
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Laura Pellatiro
    Newport
    News,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lynval

    Kerris

    Anderson,

    Jr.

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under


    18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).
    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    we

    grant

    leave

    to

    proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    United States v. Anderson, No. 2:98-cr-

    00143-HCM-1 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 18, 2012 & entered Jan. 19,
    2012).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like