Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Heath v. Corrections Corp, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Elmer Eugene Heath in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-08-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6827

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Elmer Eugene Heath in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Heath v. Corrections Corp, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of relief to Elmer Eugene Heath in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6827

    ELMER EUGENE HEATH,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA; DOCTOR
    KRANTZ; THOMAS BEASLEY; DON HUTTO; DAVID
    MYERS, CCA President; PRISON REALTY TRUST,
    INCORPORATED; J. MIKE QUILAN, Vice-Chairman;
    PAMLICO PRIVATE PRISON; ASSISTANT WARDEN
    BRANDON; ASSISTANT WARDEN HOLIDAY; WEST WING
    SUPERINTENDENT EDWARDS; CHIEF OF SECURITY
    GOMEZ; COLEY SMITH, Officer; GARY SIMPSON,
    Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-01-93-5-F(3))

    Submitted:

    August 9, 2001

    Decided:

    August 17, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Elmer Eugene Heath, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Elmer Eugene Heath appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.
    the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of


    Heath v. Corrections Corp. of Am., No. CA-01-

    93-5-F(3) (E.D.N.C. filed Apr. 26, 2001; entered Apr. 27, 2001).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like