Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stamper v. Moats, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Travis Stamper's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-05-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6200

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Travis Stamper's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Stamper v. Moats, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Travis Stamper's appeal of a district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6200

    TRAVIS STAMPER,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD MOATS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE
    STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-991659-AMD)

    Submitted:

    April 27, 2000

    Decided:

    May 3, 2000

    Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Travis Stamper, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Rachel Marblestone Kamins, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Travis Stamper seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court.

    See Stamper v. Moats, No. CA-99-

    1659-AMD (D. Md. Dec. 29, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like