Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lacy v. Chairman NY Parole, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief for Cedric Lacy's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented, so oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-01-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6952

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief for Cedric Lacy's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented, so oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Lacy v. Chairman NY Parole, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief for Cedric Lacy's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented, so oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6952

    CEDRIC LACY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CHAIRMAN,
    STATE
    OF
    NEW
    YORK
    EXECUTIVE
    DEPARTMENT, DIVISION OF PAROLE; MACK JARVIS,
    Secretary,
    North
    Carolina
    Department
    of
    Corrections,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-326-BR-5)

    Submitted:

    December 17, 1998

    Decided:

    January 5, 1999

    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Cedric Lacy, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Cedric Lacy appeals the district courts order denying relief
    on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.
    district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See Lacy v. Chairman, New York Executive Dept,

    No. CA-98-326-BR-5 (E.D.N.C. June 17, 1998). We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like