Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 94-7408
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.
(CA-91-1913-HAR)
Submitted:
Decided:
August 2, 1996
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court
awarded summary judgment as to some claims and Defendants and
conducted a jury trial as to the remaining claims and Defendants.
At the close of the evidence, the court granted Defendants' Fed. R.
Civ. P. 50(a) motion for judgment as a matter of law. With regard
to the award of summary judgment, we have reviewed the record and
the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Our de
novo review of the trial transcript similarly discloses no error in
the decision to grant the Rule 50(a) motion. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED