Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Frazier, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Cleve William Frazier appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit denied Frazier's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Frazier was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-08-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6388

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Cleve William Frazier appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit denied Frazier's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Frazier was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Frazier, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Cleve William Frazier appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As a result, the Fourth Circuit denied Frazier's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Frazier was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6388

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CLEVE WILLIAM FRAZIER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-96-54-BO, CA-99-130-4-BO)

    Submitted:

    July 27, 2000

    Decided:

    August 3, 2000

    Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Cleve William Frazier, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Cleve William Frazier seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court.

    See United States v. Frazier, Nos. CR-96-54-

    BO; CA-99-130-4-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2000). We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like