Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anderson v. Hand, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Harrison T. Anderson's civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court found no subject matter jurisdiction over Anderson's claims. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-09-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-1830

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Harrison T. Anderson's civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court found no subject matter jurisdiction over Anderson's claims. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Anderson v. Hand, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Harrison T. Anderson's civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court found no subject matter jurisdiction over Anderson's claims. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissal. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling without requiring oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-1830

    HARRISON T. ANDERSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    W. H. HAND, JR., President, THT Enterprises,
    Incorporated,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (CA-94-127-4-BO)
    Submitted:

    September 5, 1996

    Decided:

    September 17, 1996

    Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Harrison T. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Bradley Arthur Elliott,
    Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
    his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Anderson v. Hand, No. CA-94-127-4-BO (E.D.N.C. May
    23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like