Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bunch v. Lee, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from James A. G. Bunch, Jr. of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Bunch's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Bunch's complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-03-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7536

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from James A. G. Bunch, Jr. of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Bunch's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Bunch's complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Bunch v. Lee, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from James A. G. Bunch, Jr. of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found Bunch's appeal to be frivolous, dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court, which had denied Bunch's complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7536

    JAMES A. G. BUNCH, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RANDALL LEE, Superintendent; NURSE EMERY, RN
    Supervisor;
    DOCTOR
    CROCKRAN,
    Physician;
    J. A. DOBBEN, Grievance Examiner,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (CA-03-654-5-FL)

    Submitted:

    February 9, 2004

    Decided:

    March 31, 2004

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James A. G. Bunch, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James A. G. Bunch, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under
    28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the

    appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Bunch v. Lee,

    No. CA-03-654-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like