Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mack Arthur White v. David K. Smith, Warden, 67 F.3d 298, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    16 views1 page
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denying Mack Arthur White's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Therefore, the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, dispensing with oral arguments as unnecessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-09-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 67 F.3d 298 Docket: 94-7300

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denying Mack Arthur White's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Therefore, the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, dispensing with oral arguments as unnecessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    16 views1 page

    Mack Arthur White v. David K. Smith, Warden, 67 F.3d 298, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denying Mack Arthur White's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Therefore, the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case, dispensing with oral arguments as unnecessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    67 F.

    3d 298

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Mack Arthur WHITE, Petitioner--Appellant,
    v.
    David K. SMITH, Warden, Respondent--Appellee.
    No. 94-7300.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Sept. 12, 1995.

    Mack Arthur White, appellant pro se.


    John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia,
    Richmond, VA, for appellee.
    Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28
    U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
    of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. White v. Smith, No. CA-94-320-R (E.D.Va. Oct. 7, 1994). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like