Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dr. Allan L. Gant v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency Dom Grant, Dea Agent Sherrie Lanham, Dea Agent R.M. Young, Dea Agent, 103 F.3d 117, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    Dr. Allan Gant filed a civil rights action against the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and three of its agents. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. Gant appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The Fourth Circuit also determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision process.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-12-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 103 F.3d 117 Docket: 96-1508

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Dr. Allan Gant filed a civil rights action against the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and three of its agents. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. Gant appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The Fourth Circuit also determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    Dr. Allan L. Gant v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency Dom Grant, Dea Agent Sherrie Lanham, Dea Agent R.M. Young, Dea Agent, 103 F.3d 117, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Dr. Allan Gant filed a civil rights action against the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and three of its agents. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. Gant appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's decision. The Fourth Circuit also determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    103 F.

    3d 117

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Dr. Allan L. GANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY; Dom Grant, DEA
    Agent;
    Sherrie Lanham, DEA Agent; R.M. Young, DEA Agent,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 96-1508.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 21, 1996.
    Decided Dec. 3, 1996.

    Allan L. Gant, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United
    States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    S.D.W.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the
    Defendants in Grant's civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Gant v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, No.
    CA-95-982-2 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like