Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Fortescue v. Hillier, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by William Nicholas Fortescue, Jr. of various orders from the bankruptcy court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to uphold the bankruptcy court's orders. The court found no reversible errors in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-2340

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by William Nicholas Fortescue, Jr. of various orders from the bankruptcy court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to uphold the bankruptcy court's orders. The court found no reversible errors in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Fortescue v. Hillier, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by William Nicholas Fortescue, Jr. of various orders from the bankruptcy court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to uphold the bankruptcy court's orders. The court found no reversible errors in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-2340

    In Re: WILLIAM NICHOLAS FORTESCUE, JR.,


    Debtor.
    _________________________
    WILLIAMS NICHOLAS FORTESCUE, JR.,
    Debtor - Appellant,
    versus
    DAVID R. HILLIER, Trustee,
    Trustee - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District
    Judge. (CA-95-100-1, BK-93-10347)
    Submitted:

    March 13, 1997

    Decided:

    March 18, 1997

    Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    William Nicholas Fortescue, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Hillier, Appellee.

    David R.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order affirming various
    orders of the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fortescue v.
    Hillier, Nos. CA-95-100-1; BK-93-10347 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 1996). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like