Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Louis Rychwalski, Jr. v. Lieutenant Clayton, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to defendants in a Section 1983 civil rights action brought by Louis Rychwalski, Jr. against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-09-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6972

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to defendants in a Section 1983 civil rights action brought by Louis Rychwalski, Jr. against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Louis Rychwalski, Jr. v. Lieutenant Clayton, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to defendants in a Section 1983 civil rights action brought by Louis Rychwalski, Jr. against prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6972

    LOUIS RYCHWALSKI, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    LT CLAYTON; CO# MILLER; CO# COLLOTTA; MRS. K. GREEN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
    (1:12-cv-02259-GLR)

    Submitted:

    September 26, 2013

    Decided:

    September 30, 2013

    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Louis Rychwalski, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Stephanie Judith
    Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Louis

    Rychwalski,

    Jr.,

    appeals

    from

    the

    district

    courts order granting Defendants motion for summary judgment


    and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) civil rights
    action.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Rychwalski v. Clayton, No. 1:12-cv-02259-GLR

    (D. Md. June 14, 2013).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like