Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Cornelius Tucker filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit found no merit in Tucker's appeal of the denial of relief on his 1983 civil rights complaint against officials at the prison where he was incarcerated.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-11-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 43 F.3d 1468 Docket: 94-6326

    Original Title

    Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. Sergeant Hester Mr. Herron, Major, Hoke Correctional Center W. Shields, Superintendent, Hoke Correctional Center L. C. Phillips, Director, Ncdop, 43 F.3d 1468, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Cornelius Tucker filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit found no merit in Tucker's appeal of the denial of relief on his 1983 civil rights complaint against officials at the prison where he was incarcerated.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Cornelius Tucker filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit found no merit in Tucker's appeal of the denial of relief on his 1983 civil rights complaint against officials at the prison where he was incarcerated.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    43 F.

    3d 1468

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    Sergeant HESTER; Mr. Herron, Major, Hoke Correctional
    Center; W. Shields, Superintendent, Hoke
    Correctional Center; L. C. Phillips,
    Director, Ncdop, Defendants Appellees.
    No. 94-6326.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: October 18, 1994
    Decided: November 16, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-93501-5-H)
    Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on

    the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Hester, No. CA-93-501-5-H


    (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like