Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Goodwein v. Fitrer, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Alfred Goodwein on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Richmond school officials. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-05-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-2495

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Alfred Goodwein on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Richmond school officials. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views3 pages

    Goodwein v. Fitrer, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Alfred Goodwein on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Richmond school officials. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's opinion, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-2495

    ALFRED B. GOODWEIN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    HAROLD FITRER, in his capacity as Chief of
    Staff/Executive Director of Human Resources;
    DEBORAH JEWELL-SHERMAN, in her capacity as
    Superintendent of Richmond Public Schools;
    LARRY A. OLANREWAJU; CHARLES N. NANCE; DAVID
    J. BALLARD; JOAN T. MIMMS; EUGENE A. MASON,
    JR.; M. GAIL TOWNES; CAROL A.O. WOLF; R. M.
    MALONE; STEPHEN N. JOHNSON, in their nine
    respective capacities as members of the
    Richmond School Board; RICHMOND SCHOOL BOARD;
    MELVIN L. ROSE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-04-202-3)

    Submitted:

    April 28, 2005

    Decided:

    Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    May 3, 2005

    Alfred B. Goodwein, Appellant Pro Se.


    Stephanie Ploszay Karn,
    MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Alfred B. Goodwein appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    district

    court.

    Goodwein v. Fitrer, No. CA-04-202-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 25, 2004).

    See
    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like