Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Joseph J. Schepis, JR., 110 F.3d 61, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    Joseph J. Schepis, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Schepis a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit also denied Schepis's motion to stay the case and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-04-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 110 F.3d 61 Docket: 96-6868

    Original Title

    United States v. Joseph J. Schepis, Jr., 110 F.3d 61, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Joseph J. Schepis, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Schepis a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit also denied Schepis's motion to stay the case and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    United States v. Joseph J. Schepis, JR., 110 F.3d 61, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Joseph J. Schepis, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Schepis a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit also denied Schepis's motion to stay the case and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    110 F.

    3d 61

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff--Appellee,
    v.
    Joseph J. SCHEPIS, Jr., Defendant--Appellant.
    No. 96-6868.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    April 2, 1997.

    Joseph J. Schepis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Eric William Ruschky, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Joseph J. Schepis, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his
    motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and
    Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We
    have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
    appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Schepis, Nos. CR91-425-3; CA-95-4010-17-3 (D.S.C. May 14, 1996). We deny Appellant's
    motion to stay the case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like