Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Holley v. Pagan, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    Cedric Holley filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Emilio Pagan that was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Holley appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial on the reasoning stated in its opinion. The unpublished opinion from the appeals court is not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-06-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6610

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Cedric Holley filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Emilio Pagan that was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Holley appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial on the reasoning stated in its opinion. The unpublished opinion from the appeals court is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views2 pages

    Holley v. Pagan, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Cedric Holley filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Emilio Pagan that was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Holley appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's denial on the reasoning stated in its opinion. The unpublished opinion from the appeals court is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6610

    CEDRIC HOLLEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    EMILIO PAGAN,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-02-536-5-3F)

    Submitted:

    June 12, 2003

    Decided:

    June 20, 2003

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Cedric Holley, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Cedric Holley appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court.

    See Holley v. Pagan, No. CA-02-536-5-3F (E.D.N.C.

    Apr. 1, 2003).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like