Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Donald Pevia, Jr. v. Colin Ottey, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Donald Ray Pevia, Jr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The district court had denied Pevia's complaint for the reasons stated in its February 15, 2013 opinion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-07-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-6298

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Donald Ray Pevia, Jr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The district court had denied Pevia's complaint for the reasons stated in its February 15, 2013 opinion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Donald Pevia, Jr. v. Colin Ottey, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Donald Ray Pevia, Jr. on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The district court had denied Pevia's complaint for the reasons stated in its February 15, 2013 opinion. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-6298

    DONALD RAY PEVIA, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    COLIN OTTEY, M.D.; GREG FLURY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
    (1:11-cv-03438-ELH)

    Submitted:

    July 25, 2013

    Decided: July 29, 2013

    Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Donald Ray Pevia, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Patricia H. Beall,
    Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, ONEILL, OBRIEN, DOHERTY &
    KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Donald Ray Pevia, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Pevia

    v.

    Ottey,

    No.

    1:11-cv-03438-ELH

    Feb. 15, 2013, and entered Feb. 19, 2013).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    (D.

    Md.

    filed

    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like