Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Maxwell, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Lloyd George Maxwell Sr.'s appeal of a district court order denying his motion for relief from judgment and leave to amend pleadings in a criminal case. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decided oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-10-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6929

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Lloyd George Maxwell Sr.'s appeal of a district court order denying his motion for relief from judgment and leave to amend pleadings in a criminal case. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decided oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Maxwell, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Lloyd George Maxwell Sr.'s appeal of a district court order denying his motion for relief from judgment and leave to amend pleadings in a criminal case. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decided oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6929

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, SR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-93-262-A, CA-97-382-AM)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2001

    Decided:

    October 26, 2001

    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Thomas More
    Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., appeals the district courts order
    denying his Motion for Relief from Judgment and for Leave to Amend
    Pleadings.

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a cer-

    tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning


    of the district court.

    See United States v. Maxwell, Nos. CR-93-

    262-A; CA-97-382-AM (E.D. Va. May 24, 2001). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like