Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Strickler v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Robert Dale Strickler filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 appealing the district court's denial of relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Strickler was not entitled to relief. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-12-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6740

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Dale Strickler filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 appealing the district court's denial of relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Strickler was not entitled to relief. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Strickler v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Dale Strickler filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 appealing the district court's denial of relief. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Strickler was not entitled to relief. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6740

    ROBERT DALE STRICKLER,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD ANGELONE,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-99-1542-2)

    Submitted:

    November 7, 2000

    Decided:

    December 19, 2000

    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Robert Dale Strickler, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE
    OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district courts order denying relief on
    his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certifi-

    cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court.

    See Strickler v. Angelone, No. CA-99-1542-2

    (E.D. Va. May 16, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like