Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Robinson v. Taylor, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Maurice Robinson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against a state court judge, Kimberly S. Taylor, and two assistant district attorneys, Michelle Walker and Karen S. Biernacki. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation and denied relief to Robinson. Robinson appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-08-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6542

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Maurice Robinson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against a state court judge, Kimberly S. Taylor, and two assistant district attorneys, Michelle Walker and Karen S. Biernacki. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation and denied relief to Robinson. Robinson appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Robinson v. Taylor, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Maurice Robinson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against a state court judge, Kimberly S. Taylor, and two assistant district attorneys, Michelle Walker and Karen S. Biernacki. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation and denied relief to Robinson. Robinson appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the record. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6542

    MAURICE ROBINSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    KIMBERLY S. TAYLOR, Superior Court Judge; MICHELLE WALKER,
    Assistant District Attorney; KAREN S. BIERNACKI, Assistant
    District Attorney,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr.,
    District Judge. (1:08-cv-00080-WO-RAE)

    Submitted:

    July 31, 2008

    Decided:

    August 8, 2008

    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Maurice Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Maurice

    Robinson

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Robinson v. Taylor,

    No. 1:08-cv-00080-WO-RAE (M.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2008).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like