Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Neff v. Seacrist, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Frank Neff filed a § 1983 complaint against Joe Seacrist that was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Neff appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-08-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6827

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Frank Neff filed a § 1983 complaint against Joe Seacrist that was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Neff appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Neff v. Seacrist, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frank Neff filed a § 1983 complaint against Joe Seacrist that was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Neff appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6827

    FRANK M. NEFF,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOE SEACRIST,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:08-cv-0891-RDB)

    Submitted:

    August 21, 2008

    Decided:

    August 27, 2008

    Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Frank M. Neff, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Frank

    M.

    Neff

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.


    1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court. Neff v. Seacrist, No. 1:08-cv-0891-RDB (D. Md.
    April 14, 2008).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like