Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lewis M. Scarborough v. Mike Norwood Randy E. Lee, 894 F.2d 402, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Lewis Scarborough filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against prison officials Mike Norwood and Randy Lee. The district court denied Scarborough relief and adopted the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1990-01-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 894 F.2d 402 Docket: 89-6861

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lewis Scarborough filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against prison officials Mike Norwood and Randy Lee. The district court denied Scarborough relief and adopted the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Lewis M. Scarborough v. Mike Norwood Randy E. Lee, 894 F.2d 402, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lewis Scarborough filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against prison officials Mike Norwood and Randy Lee. The district court denied Scarborough relief and adopted the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    894 F.

    2d 402
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Lewis M. SCARBOROUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Mike NORWOOD; Randy E. Lee, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 89-6861.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Nov. 30, 1989.
    Decided: Jan. 9, 1990.

    Lewis M. Scarborough, appellant pro se.


    Valerie Bateman, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
    Before MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Lewis M. Scarborough appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this
    appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Scarborough v. Norwood, CA-88-361-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 1989).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like