Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Cross, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's order denying William Terrence Cross's motion for lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The Court also decided oral arguments were not necessary in making its decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-10-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6506

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's order denying William Terrence Cross's motion for lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The Court also decided oral arguments were not necessary in making its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Cross, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's order denying William Terrence Cross's motion for lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The Court also decided oral arguments were not necessary in making its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6506

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
    Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)

    Submitted:

    September 28, 2010

    Decided:

    October 4, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William Terrence Cross, Appellant


    Tayman,
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro


    Attorney,
    Newport
    News,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    William
    margin

    order

    Terrence

    denying

    Cross

    his

    appeals

    motion

    for

    jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).


    record and find no reversible error.
    district courts order.

    the

    district

    lack

    of

    courts
    personal

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm the

    United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-

    00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 2010).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like