Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Robert B. Jackson v. Earl D. Beshears, Warden, 69 F.3d 533, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from Robert B. Jackson of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 motion and subsequent denial of his Rule 59 motion to vacate that order. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided in cases No. CA-95-860-JFM. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-10-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 69 F.3d 533 Docket: 95-7023

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from Robert B. Jackson of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 motion and subsequent denial of his Rule 59 motion to vacate that order. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided in cases No. CA-95-860-JFM. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Robert B. Jackson v. Earl D. Beshears, Warden, 69 F.3d 533, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from Robert B. Jackson of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 motion and subsequent denial of his Rule 59 motion to vacate that order. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the reasoning provided in cases No. CA-95-860-JFM. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    69 F.

    3d 533

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Robert B. JACKSON, Petitioner--Appellant,
    v.
    Earl D. BESHEARS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 95-7023.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Oct. 3, 1995.
    Decided: Oct. 24, 1995.

    Robert B. Jackson, appellant pro se.


    John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr.,
    Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
    Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
    2254 (1988) motion and his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 motion to vacate that order. We
    have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and orders and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Jackson v. Beshears, No. CA-95-860-JFM (D. Md. May 16 and June 22, 1995).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like